Legal News

Derby rape suspect nabbed in Mississippi.


Model son


No way.  A professor engaging in unethical political activity?  Get out of town!


Hard to believe the police would cover for one of their own


Don't you just hate judges?


Republicans call for common sense at State Capitol?
Silly Republicans... this is Connecticut.  You'll need to go elsewhere for common sense.


Lawyer to argue that death penalty for client is too costly.
Hey, sounds like time to take up a collection.


Attorney General candidate George Jepson said this about his opponent regarding the idea of nullification:

“I am deeply concerned that someone who seeks to be the state’s chief legal officer would support a discredited and divisive doctrine that ignores the rule of law and our democratic processes,” Jepsen said."

Translation from liberal-puke-speak:

“I am deeply concerned that someone who seeks to be the state’s chief legal officer would support the rights of the People of Connecticut”

Thats right Jepsen, we should all just bend over and take it like a liberal.  I have to say this, you would make a worthy successor to Blumenthal.

Connecticut Real Estate Lawyers in Connecticut | Dammit Man, Your Legal Fees Cost More Than My House!

The Role Of A Connecticut Real Estate Lawyer

Author: Stu Pearson


A Connecticut Real estate attorney must and at all times, make sure that the client has willingly firm and determined legally the rights to what concerns the client's wants in a real estate situation. This includes the broad and extensive range of real estate asset types.



Moreover, a real estate lawyer should comprehend and be aware of the methods to obtain, communicate, portray and acquire each of the very huge number of classes and groups of real estate types. And of course, be able to advice a client which is possibly the most creative and financially beneficial.



A newcomer to real estate investing should learn the basic principles as well as the income tax treatment of real estate. This is also because there are many tax consequences and conflicts (either good or bad) that are often encountered in real estate ownership under several tax laws. Having high-quality legal work in the real estate practice area both shelters and adjoins outstanding value to the oldest exceptional asset in the world.



Transactions that occur in real estate vary from simple house closing including the title, survey, contract, home mortgage, and closing adjustments; to office leasing, warehouse, retail, manufacturing, and other space classes. It involves the financing for acquisition of real estate assets. It also includes the entitlement and permitting the use of real estate assets to construction, design and improvement or enhancement to these real estate assets as well as their development.



The value any capable Connecticut lawyer can add goes further than what the clients expect. Adding value with creative legal work contributes to the attainment of client necessities.



Moreover, real legal value draws from the structural constituent and building blocks that run from the lawyer's familiarity, practice, and counseling in order to obtain tax benefits and eventually making the most of the asset value in the market. In addition, this fully apprehends the use of the real estate interest and concerns while constantly keeping in close contact with the client's purposes and intentions.



A good real estate Connecticut lawyer not only counsels his or her client in their legal needs and queries but also deals with the problem with utmost care and concern to the consequences that may arise, while still fulfilling the client's goals and expectations.



In the world of real estate, there are numerous situations that you may encounter once you become a real estate investor. And finding the right real estate lawyer must be the first priority. These real estate lawyers are the ones responsible for the legal needs and understand all legal transactions that you may not know at all. He or she is responsible for keeping you informed and aware of the legal problems and conflicts that can arise in relation to your real estate assets and investing needs.

Article Source: http://www.articlesbase.com/law-articles/the-role-of-a-connecticut-real-estate-lawyer-276390.html

About the Author

Stu Pearson has an interest in Business related topics. To access more information on connecticut real estate lawyers please click on the link.

Whisteblower Protection in Connecticut | Hey, My Boss is a Total A%#HOLE!

The Whistleblower Protection Law

Author: James Monahan


It was not until 1986 when a law protecting whistleblowers is made. Congress added an anti-retaliation protection to the then existing False Claims Act.
A whistleblower is a person who tells on something he believes is an illegal act. The employees are the most commonly known whistleblower. They tell on their employers which they suspect is doing or committing an illegal act.
Under the Whistleblower Protection Law, the employee should not be discharged, denoted, suspended, threatened or harassed in any form that discriminates the terms and conditions of his employment because of the legal act done by the employee.
The employee may be of aid in many ways possible on the investigation, testimony and the likes. However there are some constraints under the whistleblower protection law.
Reporting illegal acts that are only within the company is a ground for exemption. But still there may be public policies that could protect the employee from retaliation
If it turns out that an employer didn't actually break a law, the employee is still entitled to whistle blower protection from retaliation, if he reasonably believed that the employer committed an illegal act.
The whistleblower protection law does not cover employer retaliation for complaints about personal loathe. Office politics is not to be used as a basis for filing a complaint against the employer and use the whistleblower protection for personal gain.
In order for the employee to be protected from employer retaliation, he may the have a suspected desecration of any Federal Law. But the supposed violation should have provisions that the law violated will protect whistleblowers.
The Whistleblower Federal Law, unlike the False Claims Act, allows the whistleblower to file a lawsuit in a federal court. The Federal Whistleblower Law does not permit the whistleblower to go directly to the court.
The individuals concerned are pursued administratively. These individuals concerned could file a complaint or charge to retaliate with or without a lawyer to represent them. However if the case is not resolved immediately, the administrative law judge may then preside over the only evidentiary hearing that may take place.
A whistleblower should not attempt to delay an investigation of the possible legal remedy. To maintain this ruling, the retaliation should then be brought to the attention of an appropriate government official within 30 days, else the complaint could not be pursued.
Most states have some sort of statutory or common law "whistleblower" or anti-retaliation laws. Like the federal whistleblower laws, not every lawyer will know about these laws, especially laws outside their own state.
These states and the District of Columbia have recognized a public policy exception to the "employment at will doctrine": Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Florida, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Tennessee, Texas, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin and Wyoming.
Some states have explicit statutory protections for whistleblowers. These include: California, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Hawaii, Louisiana, Maine, Michigan, Minnesota, Montana, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Oregon, Rhode Island, Tennessee, and Washington.
There are also state laws that offer special protections just for their own state or local government employees: Alaska, Arizona, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Missouri, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Washington, West Virginia and Wisconsin.


Article Source: http://www.articlesbase.com/law-articles/the-whistleblower-protection-law-9265.html

About the Author

James Monahan is the owner and Senior Editor of
WhistleblowerBuzz.com and writes expert
articles about whistleblowers.

Foreclosure in Connecticut | Come On, Don't Take My Freakin House!

Connecticut Foreclosure Law Summary

Author: Alexander Thomas


In Connecticut, only judicial foreclosure is conducted.





What is the processing period for foreclosure in Connecticut?


Normally processing period is of two months in Connecticut.





Is there any right of redemption in Connecticut for foreclosure?


No, there is no right of redemption.





Are deficiency judgments permitted in Connecticut?


Yes, deficiency judgments are permitted in Connecticut.





Which law provision governs foreclosure in Connecticut?


The laws which govern Connecticut foreclosures are found in Title 49 (Mortgages and Liens), Chapter 846 (Mortgages), §49-1 to §49-31j of the General Statutes of Connecticut.





What happens during Judicial Foreclosure in Connecticut?


There are two types of foreclosures followed in Connecticut.


Strict foreclosure


Foreclosure by sale





In strict foreclosure, there is no actual sale of property. Lender has to go to court and obtain court order mentioning that the borrower is in default. If he succeeds in that, the property is transferred in his name automatically. But court also give some time to borrower for the payment, if he fails in doing so, it goes to lender automatically. Then the lender has to record a certificate of foreclosure within 30 days which should have description of property, the foreclosure proceedings, the mortgage and the date the title became absolute.





In foreclosure by sale, the court decides time and manner of the sale, appoints a committee for said sale and also appoints three appraisers to determine the property value. The borrower has right to stop the sale by giving balance payment any time. Generally sale occurs on the property on a Saturday. A deposit of 10 percent of the property's value is required from the winning bidder, unless the lender is the winning bidder.





This is legal information; it should not be treated as legal advice.


Article Source: http://www.articlesbase.com/real-estate-articles/connecticut-foreclosure-law-summary-226423.html

About the Author

For get more information :



http://www.entrusthome.com/14-stop-foreclosure-connecticut.php

Bankruptcy in Connecticut | Being Broke Sucks!

Bankruptcy in Connecticut

Author: Cole


Though the Connecticut economy has weathered the national financial crisis better than most parts of the country, residents have become increasingly worried about carrying unhealthy amounts of consumer debts in such uncertain times. In the face of ever spiraling credit card balances, too many Connecticut borrowers we have spoken with see no other option beyond bankruptcy protection. To be sure, for the most desperate debtors, Chapter 7 debt elimination may well be the best – or, indeed, the only – option available to clear their accounts and start fresh (no matter how long the process may take). Alas, legislation passed four years ago by the United States Congress dramatically altered both the protections that bankruptcy could offer ordinary individuals and their treatment should Chapter 7 bankruptcy in Connecticut even be rendered available. Much as the federal statutes were changed because of pressure from political action committees bankrolled by the credit card companies, it cannot be said that consumers had not taken advantage of past bankruptcy statutes to exploit the former system. With lenders opening accounts to seemingly every Connecticut borrower looking for an excuse to spend freely and without consequence, too many households found themselves unable to pay back foolish purchases. There’s always been a need for bankruptcy protection in America, but, alongside the new opportunities for credit, consumers – in Connecticut and across the nation – took untoward advantage of the spending freedoms and paved the way for current restrictions.


To be sure, especially for those Connecticut borrowers who’ve faced unusual torments – whether loss of employment or hospitalization or similar unforeseen tragedies – Chapter 7 bankruptcies still serve as a seawall stemming the onrushing tides of debts. Those consumers filing for bankruptcy protection this very moment may have to pay a bit more for credit counseling classes (certificate required before the Connecticut court clerk shall even process the bankruptcy petition), and, given the continually more detailed paperwork involved, experienced bankruptcy attorneys are more important than ever – with prices to match their newfound value. Furthermore, most taxes, all student loans, debts that came as a result of criminal fraud, and all familial obligations from alimony to child support shan’t be touched by any governmental protection. Chapter 7 bankruptcies in the state of Connecticut will not also touch any purchases more than five hundred dollars that had been made in the last three months before the bankruptcy petition is filed. More to the point, the Chapter 7 bankruptcy proceedings – even if the borrowers will successfully argue eligibility to the Connecticut court trustee and genuinely manage to liquidate those debts that would be considered viable under current rules – actively look to take whatever possessions from the filers are open to seizure by law.


Whenever a borrower declares bankruptcy in Connecticut, the individuals retain the option of invoking either federal or local bankruptcy exemption to protect their personal property. As yet another example of the importance of attorneys trained in bankruptcy law, and, considering the current economic problems, law firms have been switching the emphasis of their practices right and left. Every Connecticut debtor should take special care researching their lawyers’ level of experience regarding the matter. Those legal professionals well trained in their craft should be able to guide their clients through the Chapter 7 proceedings with a minimum of loss (though some damages must be assumed, regardless), and, most especially, the attorneys chosen should be more than familiar with the distinctions between the exemptions recorded under Connecticut state law as opposed to the severely more limited options granted by the federal government. These statutes are intended to help borrowers keep hold of their more prized possessions, but, since the equity of all property will be subject to a somewhat arbitrary estimation of their replacement value (as opposed to, in recent years, before the past legislation, the far more forgiving resale value), all borrowers have to consider the potential fluctuations.


Obviously, we cannot list every single Chapter 7 bankruptcy exemption that’s recorded under Connecticut law. Your authors would be remiss, once again, if we pretended to do more than offer merely an overview of the larger guidelines available within the Connecticut bankruptcy code. At the same point, however, every consumer interested in the bankruptcy debt elimination alternative should have some knowledge about the protections available. Nothing’s guaranteed, of course, as long as so much depends upon the whims of the bankruptcy trustee randomly selected by the Connecticut judicial system, but all borrowers may as well have an awareness of what may be seized. Each state, for example, maintains a so-called homestead exemption, and, in Connecticut, the borrowers are allowed seventy five thousand dollars equity of their primary residence whether that may be home, condo, trailer, or house boat. Similarly, fifteen hundred dollars of equity for an automobile or any motor vehicle shall be protected by the state of Connecticut, and, if a married couple files a petition for Chapter 7 bankruptcy jointly, the exemption’s raised to three thousand dollars (the home exemption, alas, is not doubled for spouses).


Further, Connecticut law protects household furnishings – from living room tables to couches to bedroom linens – provided there’s nothing valued above ordinary means. Funds from life insurance benefits granted the filer or filers will be secured for as much as the trustee (based upon the Internal Revenue Service guideline for Connecticut) deems necessary for support. The treatment of retirement plans in Connecticut, on the other hand, varies greatly. Pensions and any dividends from stock market investments or similar annuities could reasonably be expected to be guarded so long as the courts believe the retirement plan to be necessary income. In the same way, all tools and materials related to the trade of the consumers filing – up to a certain amount, depending upon the profession and the objects involved – should not be threatened, and, as long as taxes or familiar support are not already past due, unemployment benefits from the state of Connecticut will continue unabated through bankruptcy. Worker’s compensation and any money due the newly bankrupt resulting from injury shall continue to be paid regardless of debt presuming the attorneys do their jobs properly. Connecticut residents are virtually the only Americans to be guaranteed protection of such debts, and they need to make absolutely sure that their lawyers are certain of all local loop holes. We live in an especially forgiving state, to be sure. Connecticut, uniquely, offers a “wildcard” exemption for their residents petitioning for Chapter 7 bankruptcy protection that vouchsafes personal property of any sort up to one thousand dollars above and beyond the preceding exemptions. While this “wildcard” will still be subject to the whims of the courts, remember that all actual values (even family heirlooms) are based upon governmental oversight. Connecticut debtors truly in need of debt liquidation are certainly better off than their fellow citizens residing in less enlightened states, but the potential disadvantages of bankruptcy must still be kept in mind.


Chapter 7 bankruptcies truly are a last ditch measure for only the most desperate of borrowers. Despite the Connecticut exemptions, potential seizure of assets by the courts to auction with proceeds remunerating lenders remains a constant risk. Much as your authors recognize the current economic difficulties affecting Connecticut and the nation at large, bankruptcy protection’s no longer a catch all for all problems that may affect consumers who’ve spent unwisely or fallen upon hard times. Especially considering the other debt relief options now available to Connecticut borrowers (and the expenses of even an initial consultation with bankruptcy lawyers), only those consumers truly without another alternative should even think about braving the rigors of Chapter 7 debt elimination, but, at the same point, consumers should examine all of the debt management strategies just as thoroughly as they would Connecticut bankruptcy protection. Consumer Credit Counseling, for example, has been largely debunked in the past few years after media watchdogs and governmental investigators discovered that CCC firms – even the ones announcing themselves as non profit – actually take more money from the credit card companies they’re supposedly fighting against than their genuine consumer clients. Similarly, after the implosion of the mortgage loan industry and the falling real estate values throughout Connecticut and all of New England, debt consolidation based upon equity loans should be avoided no matter how supposedly low the interest rates offered or smooth the loan officer’s sales pitch.


The debt settlement strategy, though it may seem faintly miraculous to Connecticut borrowers unfamiliar with the program, isn’t actually that far different from Consumer Credit Counseling or other debt consolidation approaches rather more publicized within the greater Connecticut area. Well trained debt settlement negotiators, generally (since this is a relatively new field) trailing experience in the financial planning or credit counseling economic sectors, who often work in tandem with attorney or economic advisors, argue for surprisingly substantial reductions to their clients unsecured debt accounts and our Connecticut respondents have regularly reported immediate credit card balance cuts of more than fifty percent. To successfully argue their point, the debt settlement firm effectively takes over their Connecticut clients’ accumulated debt loads. Under the new debt settlement plan, you will make regular payments to the firm, which in turn will pay back the creditors until you are completely without credit card and other unsecured debts in less than five years or sixty months. While, unfortunately, not every Connecticut borrower would be accepted into a debt settlement program – not all lenders shall agree to participate in negotiations – the potential for assistance absent the costs and loss of property Chapter 7 bankruptcy now entails should lead every wise Connecticut resident worried about their spiraling debt loads to at least investigate the approach. Every debt situation is different and, without analyzing the borrowers’ specific situation, it would be irresponsible for your authors to recommend one debt relief strategy above another. However, after talking to countless Connecticut debtors who’ve tackled their unpaid loans (both successfully and otherwise), we certainly would hope that appropriate Connecticut residents attempting to eliminate their credit card balances at least look into debt settlement before rushing headlong toward a potentially disastrous bankruptcy solution.

Article Source: http://www.articlesbase.com/finance-articles/bankruptcy-in-connecticut-760017.html

About the Author

My name is Cole Collins I am a professional in the financial fields of bankruptcy and debt settlement.

Legal News

Firearm Ring Taken Down in Bridgeport, Connecticut

Federal and State law enforcement officials arrested 17 people in connection with firearms trafficking in Bridgeport.  No information on suspects' attorneys.  Story in Connecticut Post.

Donation Thief Arrested

A man was arrested for stealing the donation jar from disabled vets group.  He apparently has a lengthy criminal record.  Defense lawyer unknown.  Article

Update:  Lawyers Will Not Appeal Judge's Decision on Request to Close Courtroom

Criminal Defense Attorneys for Steve Hayes announced that they will not appeal a Superior Court Judge's ruling to keep the courtroom open during a pretrial hearing.  The lawyers had argued that the jury, which has already been selected, may be prejudiced by new reports of the hearing.  Article

Ansonia Man Faces Prison in Daughter's Death

Under a sentence recommendation by the State's Attorney's Office, an Ansonia man faces up to three years in prison in connection with the death of his daughter.  His defense lawyer says that he could face up to four additional years in prison if he violates probation after his release.  Article

Well Hello There

Just wanted to say hi.

Attempted Murder and Beer

An undocumented immigrant (illegal alien for those of you not cowed by political correctness), was charged with Attempted Murder.  (read article)  He allegedly stabbed a man in the stomach following an argument about beer.  It is speculated that he was attempting to retrieve the beer that the victim took and drank without permission. 

Attempted Murder is a pretty serious charge and this guy is probably in a lot of trouble.  However, some legal analysts anticipate that the charge will be reduced to Jaywalking once the guy explains that he is only in this country to do work that Americans won't do.  Furthermore, President Obama is expected to give a speech later in the day in which he will denouce the arresting officers as "racist cops who acted stupidly".

Love Lost in West Haven Homeless Tent Compound

She left him alone in their tent.  Come on, what did she expect?  He must have been beating them away with a stick.  No woman can refuse the charms of a man with his own tent.  Seriously, his own tent!

Anyway, it all ended badly.  She caught Prince Charming having his way with another woman in that tent.  So she did what any other self-respecting West Haven tent-dweller would do:  she stabbed him in the eye.  Now she faces criminal charges.

Read the story in the New Haven Register

Sex Offender Felled by Sponge Balls

Seems sex offenders are impervious to everything but sponge balls.  Luckily, police from Guilford and Branford knew of this weakness when they were called to a disturbance on Tuesday. 

From the New Haven Register:

GUILFORD — A registered sex offender arrested Tuesday in a domestic violence dispute was arraigned in his hospital room Wednesday by a group of court personnel and held in lieu of $250,000 bail.

Gerald Ignatowski, 57, of Wauwinet Trail, was arraigned at Yale-New Haven Hospital where he was taken after allegedly threatening a girlfriend with a gun and being shot in the chest by police using a weapon that fires a sponge ball, Deputy Chief Jeffrey Hutchinson said.

read the whole article

Those crazy sex offenders and their near-invincibility!

Attorneys Argue Pretrial Issue

A Superior Court Judge in Cheshire has denied a motion by lawyers for Defendant Steven Hayes to close the courtroom for pretrial motions so that jurors will not be prejudiced by news coverage of the hearing.  Jurors have already been selected in this case, although they are not scheduled to hear any testimony until the trial starts in September.

Seems to me that the defense attorneys have a valid concern here.  Typically, jurors are instructed not to listen to or read anything about a trial that might appear in the media.  They are also instructed not to consider anything other than the evidence admitted at trial when reaching their verdict.  Jurors however, as far as I understand, are people.  Quite the temptation I would think.

On the other hand, there are constitutional issues at play compelling trials to be open to the public.  I am sure that the judge in this case gave due consideration to all the legal arguments for and against before deciding not to close the courtroom.  I do not second-guess his ruling.  However....

Here's a novel idea:  why not wait until September (when the trial is suppose to begin) to pick the freakin jury?  Then, lawyers for both sides can question potential jurors about what they may have already learned about the case from the media.  They can strike for cause those jurors who are prejudiced, and eliminate this whole question as a potential appellate issue.  Just a suggestion.

If you wish, read more about this case in the Hartford Courant.

Shelton Purse Snatchers Arrested

Four very attractive people were arrested after snatching the purse of a 67 year-old woman.  Police from Trumbull, Bridgeport and Shelton were all involved in the arrest.  One of the suspects somehow lost his favorite shirt during the incident.  He was reportedly very upset and sobbed much of the night until drifting peacefully to sleep.

Read the full story from the Connecticut Post, complete with lovely photos, here.

Greenwich Attorney Guilty of Tax Evasion

Well-known attorney and TV legal analyst Mickey Sherman pleaded guilty in Federal Court for failing to pay $1.1 million in taxes.

From the Connecticut Post:

Sherman, 63, of Greenwich pleaded guilty before U.S. District Judge Janet C. Hall to two misdemeanor charges of willfully failing to pay taxes on returns he filed in 2001 and 2002.

He faces up to a year in prison on each charge when she sentences him Sept. 27. He also could see his license to practice law suspended by the state.

For shame, Mickey.